Alexander v. Miller
10 Wend. 603
This text of 10 Wend. 603 (Alexander v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alexander v. Miller, 10 Wend. 603 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).
Opinion
By the Court,
A replication with notice, as put in by the plaintiff is conformable to the statute, 2 R. S. 355, ■§ 26, and is not a special pleading, within the rule or the reason of it, requiring the signature of counsel. 2 Caines, 60. 8 Johns. R. 328. Graham’s Pr. 210, and cases there died. The motion is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Wend. 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-miller-nysupct-1833.