Alexander v. McLaughlin

246 A.D. 189, 285 N.Y.S. 261, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8690
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 25, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 246 A.D. 189 (Alexander v. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. McLaughlin, 246 A.D. 189, 285 N.Y.S. 261, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendaiits, as sheriff and deputy sheriff, respectively, made a levy, under execution, upon certain personal property of plaintiff, a judgment debtor; and procured it to be sold without giving notice of sale as prescribed by section 707 of the Civil Practice Act. Defendants did not themselves sell the property, but induced and employed certain tenants on shares, upon the farm of plaintiff, to sell the property, consisting of annual crops, and to turn over to defendants the one-half of the proceeds belonging to plaintiff. Since defendants could not lawfully sell plaintiff’s property under execution without giving the notice required by law, they could not authorize the plaintiff’s tenants to do so. It is a wise provision of law that requires public notice of a sale of property under an execution, and neglect by defendants to give such notice cannot be excused by showing that the sale was made for an adequate price. There is no evidence that plaintiff’s brother, who was plaintiff’s agent for the management of the farm, ever consented to the irregularity, or that plaintiff’s tenants, who did consent, had any authority to do so.

All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Judgment reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eckstein v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
24 N.E.2d 114 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
Charles H. Dauchy Co. v. Wilkinson
251 A.D. 53 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 189, 285 N.Y.S. 261, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-mclaughlin-nyappdiv-1935.