Alexander v. Maryland Lottery

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2839

MARY M. ALEXANDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARYLAND LOTTERY AGENCY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 93-973-S)

Submitted: April 7, 1998 Decided: April 24, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary M. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Paul Fletcher-Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Margaret Witherup Tindall, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing this

action alleging hostile environment sexual discrimination and deny-

ing Appellant's various post-judgment motions. Because the conduct

alleged in this case to constitute harassment was not the sort that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court.* Alexander v. Maryland Lottery, No. CA-93-973-S (D. Md. Dec. 19, 1996). We deny the motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

AFFIRMED

* See Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc. , 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993).