Alexander v. . Lowrance
109 S.E. 641, 182 N.C. 646, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 291
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alexander v. . Lowrance. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 N.C. 642 →
Opinion
Tbe disposition of this case is governed by tbe decision adjudging tbe plaintiffs entitled to tbe writ of mandamus. We have held tbat tbe plaintiffs are entitled to tbe proceeds arising from tbe sale of tbe bonds, and it follows as a corollary tbat tbe plaintiffs are entitled to have tbe fund protected from expenditure by tbe defendants. Tbe judgment continuing tbe restraining order is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alexander v. . Lowrance, 109 S.E. 641, 182 N.C. 646, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 291 (N.C. 1921).
109 S.E. 641 (Alexander v. . Lowrance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.