Alexander v. Long Island Railroad Employees' Mutual Relief Ass'n

133 Misc. 610, 233 N.Y.S. 5, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 651
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 133 Misc. 610 (Alexander v. Long Island Railroad Employees' Mutual Relief Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. Long Island Railroad Employees' Mutual Relief Ass'n, 133 Misc. 610, 233 N.Y.S. 5, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On the record presented it was error to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. A new trial is, therefore, necessary. For the guidance of the court on such new trial we wish to state that it is our view that evidence as to the telephone conversation between the wife of the deceased and the defendant Long Island Railroad Company was erroneously excluded. (Ratomski v. Quittner, 214 App. Div. 186.)

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellants to abide the event.

All concur; present, Bijur, Peters and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ratomski v. Quittner
214 A.D. 186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 Misc. 610, 233 N.Y.S. 5, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-long-island-railroad-employees-mutual-relief-assn-nyappterm-1929.