Alexander v. KJ GODDARD, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Alexander v. KJ GODDARD, INC.

311 S.W.3d 388, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 720, 2010 WL 2055980

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 25, 2010·No. ED 93483·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward J. Alexander appeals from the trial court’s grant of K.J. Goddard, Inc., Jeff Goddard and Kellie Goddard’s motion to dismiss his two count petition alleging breach of a promissory note and money had and received.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward J. Alexander appeals from the trial court’s grant of K.J. Goddard, Inc., Jeff Goddard and Kellie Goddard’s motion to dismiss his two count petition alleging breach of a promissory note and money had and received.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Alexander v. KJ GODDARD, INC., 311 S.W.3d 388, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 720, 2010 WL 2055980 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

311 S.W.3d 388 (Alexander v. KJ GODDARD, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related