Alexander v. Hancock Bank

241 So. 2d 810, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 4796
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 9, 1970·No. No. 3234·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

CULPEPPER, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this suit against the Hancock Bank, domiciled in Gulfport, Mississippi, for damages for the illegal seizure and sale of a Cadillac vehicle on which it held a mortgage.

Defendant filed an exception to the Court’s jurisdiction over the person. The trial court overruled the exception. Defendant has appealed.

Plaintiff-appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal under LSA-C.C.P. Article 2083 which reads as follows :

“An appeal may be taken from a final judgment rendered in causes in which appeals are given by law whether rendered after hearing or by default, and from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury.”

Our jurisprudence is established that a judgment overruling an exception to jurisdiction over the person is interlocutory and, in the absence of irreparable injury, is not appealable. Woodcock v. Crehan, La.App., 28 So.2d 61 (1st Cir. 1946) ; Gierczic v. Gierczic, La.App., 150 So.2d 84, 86 (4th Cir. 1963). No irreparable injury is shown here.

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed at defendant-appellant’s cost.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. Hancock Bank, 241 So. 2d 810, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 4796 (La. Ct. App. 1970).

241 So. 2d 810 (Alexander v. Hancock Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fontenot v. O'BRIEN
302 So. 2d 399 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)
Allied Nav. Co., Inc. v. INTERN. ORG. OF MASTERS, MATES & PILOTS
272 So. 2d 23 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1973)