Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited

657 S.E.2d 743, 376 S.C. 466, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 37

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 6, 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited, 365 S.C. 509, 618 S.E.2d 307 (Ct.App.2005). Pursuant to Rule 232, SCACR, the parties have submitted a settlement agreement to this Court. After careful consideration, we accept the proposed agreement. In addition, we hereby vacate the Court of Appeals’ published opinion in this matter.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JAMES E. MOORE, JOHN H. WALLER, JR., and COSTA M. PLEICONES, JJ., and R. FERRELL COTHRAN, JR., A.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited, 365 S.C. 509, 618 S.E.2d 307 (Ct.App.2005). Pursuant to Rule 232, SCACR, the parties have submitted a settlement agreement to this Court. After careful consideration, we accept the proposed agreement. In addition, we hereby vacate the Court of Appeals’ published opinion in this matter.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JAMES E. MOORE, JOHN H. WALLER, JR., and COSTA M. PLEICONES, JJ., and R. FERRELL COTHRAN, JR., A.J.

Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited, 657 S.E.2d 743, 376 S.C. 466, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 37 (S.C. 2008).

Pincite

657 S.E.2d 743 (Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related