Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited

657 S.E.2d 743, 376 S.C. 466, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 37

DecidedFebruary 6, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 657 S.E.2d 743 (Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited, 657 S.E.2d 743, 376 S.C. 466, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 37 (S.C. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited, 365 S.C. 509, 618 S.E.2d 307 (Ct.App.2005). Pursuant to Rule 232, SCACR, the parties have submitted a settlement agreement to this Court. After careful consideration, we accept the proposed agreement. In addition, we hereby vacate the Court of Appeals’ published opinion in this matter.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JAMES E. MOORE, JOHN H. WALLER, JR., and COSTA M. PLEICONES, JJ., and R. FERRELL COTHRAN, JR., A.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Alexander v. Forklifts Unlimited, 365 S.C. 509, 618 S.E.2d 307 (Ct.App.2005). Pursuant to Rule 232, SCACR, the parties have submitted a settlement agreement to this Court. After careful consideration, we accept the proposed agreement. In addition, we hereby vacate the Court of Appeals’ published opinion in this matter.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JAMES E. MOORE, JOHN H. WALLER, JR., and COSTA M. PLEICONES, JJ., and R. FERRELL COTHRAN, JR., A.J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

657 S.E.2d 743, 376 S.C. 466, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-forklifts-unlimited-sc-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack