Alexander v. Fioto

429 U.S. 1086, 97 S. Ct. 1093
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 22, 1977
DocketNo. 75-1704
StatusPublished

This text of 429 U.S. 1086 (Alexander v. Fioto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. Fioto, 429 U.S. 1086, 97 S. Ct. 1093 (1977).

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. Y. [Probable jurisdiction noted sub nom. Hoffmann v. Fioto, ante, p. 814.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General to permit Stephen L. Urbanczyk, Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 U.S. 1086, 97 S. Ct. 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-fioto-scotus-1977.