Alexander v. Esten
1 Cai. Cas. 152
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 152 (Alexander v. Esten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alexander v. Esten, 1 Cai. Cas. 152 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).
Opinion
THE court ruled that it was the praptice to confine a party. [153]*153to the objects specified in his notice, and the present being to set aside an execution, they would not allow it to be extended to the judgment.
Lewis, chief justice, absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-esten-nysupct-1803.