Alexander v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Alexander v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance

118 S.E.2d 215, 102 Ga. App. 750, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 740

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 30, 1960

Docket38333

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 118 S.E.2d 215 (Alexander v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alexander v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance, 118 S.E.2d 215, 102 Ga. App. 750, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 740 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Carlisle, Judge.

Where the facts adduced upon the hearing before the single director of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation show that the claimant was a minor natural child of the deceased employee who was killed as the result of an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment; that the claimant’s mother and father had been divorced and the mother remarried; and, that the claimant had been legally adopted by his mother’s second husband and wholly supported by him, under the ruling in New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Freeland, 216 Ga. 492, such claimant was not entitled to recover compensation as a dependent of the deceased employee, and the judge of the superior court did not err in reversing the award of the single director granting-compensation.

Judgment affirmed.

Townsend, P. J., Frankum kind Jordan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlisle, Judge.

Where the facts adduced upon the hearing before the single director of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation show that the claimant was a minor natural child of the deceased employee who was killed as the result of an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment; that the claimant’s mother and father had been divorced and the mother remarried; and, that the claimant had been legally adopted by his mother’s second husband and wholly supported by him, under the ruling in New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Freeland, 216 Ga. 492, such claimant was not entitled to recover compensation as a dependent of the deceased employee, and the judge of the superior court did not err in reversing the award of the single director granting-compensation.

Judgment affirmed.

Townsend, P. J., Frankum kind Jordan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 S.E.2d 215, 102 Ga. App. 750, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-employers-mutual-liability-insurance-gactapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack