Alexander v. Cleveland Clinic Found.
This text of 2011 Ohio 5936 (Alexander v. Cleveland Clinic Found.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Alexander v. Cleveland Clinic Found., 130 Ohio St.3d 401, 2011-Ohio-5936.]
ALEXANDER, APPELLEE, v. CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, APPELLANT. [Cite as Alexander v. Cleveland Clinic Found., 130 Ohio St.3d 401, 2011-Ohio-5936.] Discretionary appeal accepted, court of appeals’ judgment vacated, and cause remanded for application of Dohme v. Eurand Am., Inc. (No. 2011-1282—Submitted November 1, 2011—Decided November 23, 2011.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 95727, 2011-Ohio-2924. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Dohme v. Eurand Am., Inc., 130 Ohio St.3d 168, 2011-Ohio-4609, 956 N.E.2d 825. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Michael T. Conway & Co. and Michael T. Conway, for appellee. Frantz Ward, L.L.P., Michael N. Chesney, Christopher G. Keim, and Kelly S. Lawrence, for appellant. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 5936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-cleveland-clinic-found-ohio-2011.