Alexander v. City of Miami
This text of 833 So. 2d 210 (Alexander v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the order of summary judgment, as the City was not liable as a matter of law for any injuries sustained by plaintiff at the location alleged in his pre-suit notice and his complaint.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to amend. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190(b) (2001); Frenz Enters., Inc. v. Port Everglades, 746 So.2d 498, 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend complaint where proposed amendment would “materially vary the originally asserted grounds for relief’).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
833 So. 2d 210, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18561, 2002 WL 31828834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-city-of-miami-fladistctapp-2002.