Alexander v. City of Detroit

242 N.W. 902, 259 Mich. 241, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 954
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 1932·No. Docket No. 156, Calendar No. 36,346.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Defendant, by condemnation proceedings, acquired the whole of a certain lot for the purpose of opening and widening an avenue. It used only part of the lot for such purpose, leaving unused a five-foot strip between the street and plaintiffs' property. It levied special paving and sidewalk taxes, itself paid the assessment on the five-foot strip and assessed plaintiffs as owners abutting the street. Plaintiffs brought this suit to set aside the assessment, restrain its collection, and for other relief appropriate thereto, and had decree.

The case is ruled by Panfil v. City of Detroit, 246 Mich. 149, and the decree is affirmed, with costs.

CLARK, C.J., and McDONALD, POTTER, NORTH, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred. SHARPE, J., took no part in this decision. *Page 242

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. City of Detroit, 242 N.W. 902, 259 Mich. 241, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 954 (Mich. 1932).

242 N.W. 902 (Alexander v. City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wikman v. City of Novi
322 N.W.2d 103 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1982)
Marqua v. City of Detroit
256 N.W. 455 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)
Vetal v. City of Detroit
253 N.W. 256 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)