Alexander v. City of Atlanta

95 S.E. 267, 21 Ga. App. 737, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 503
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 7, 1918
Docket8653
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 267 (Alexander v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. City of Atlanta, 95 S.E. 267, 21 Ga. App. 737, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission and rejection of evidence, are without merit.

2. The burden was upon the defendant to sustain all the essential allegations in his affidavit of illegality; and the evidence being insufficient to show that the execution was proceeding illegally, a verdict against him was demanded, and the court did not err in so' directing.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of LaGrange v. Frosolona
183 S.E. 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Hill v. City of Calhoun
171 S.E. 459 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Felker v. Still
133 S.E. 519 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 267, 21 Ga. App. 737, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1918.