Alexander v. City of Atlanta
95 S.E. 267, 21 Ga. App. 737, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 503
Opinion
1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission and rejection of evidence, are without merit.
2. The burden was upon the defendant to sustain all the essential allegations in his affidavit of illegality; and the evidence being insufficient to show that the execution was proceeding illegally, a verdict against him was demanded, and the court did not err in so' directing.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alexander v. City of Atlanta, 95 S.E. 267, 21 Ga. App. 737, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
95 S.E. 267 (Alexander v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of LaGrange v. Frosolona
183 S.E. 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Hill v. City of Calhoun
171 S.E. 459 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Felker v. Still
133 S.E. 519 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)