Alexander v. . Alexander's Executors
4 N.C. 28
Opinion
The act of 1715 is clearly a bar to the plaintiff's recovery; and it is not, therefore, necessary to consider the question as to the ordinary statute of limitations.
Cited: McKeithan v. McGill,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alexander v. . Alexander's Executors, 4 N.C. 28 (N.C. 1814).
4 N.C. 28 (Alexander v. . Alexander's Executors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Featherston v. . Wilson
31 S.E. 843 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)
Mordecai v. . Oliver
10 N.C. 479 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1825)