Alexander v. Alexander

162 S.E. 437, 164 S.C. 466, 82 A.L.R. 719, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 20
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 1, 1932
Docket13341
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 162 S.E. 437 (Alexander v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. Alexander, 162 S.E. 437, 164 S.C. 466, 82 A.L.R. 719, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 20 (S.C. 1932).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Bease.

It is our opinion that the well-prepared order of his Honor, County Judge Foster, in this case is correct. Accordingly, the exceptions thereto are overruled, and the order is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Stabler, Carter and Bonham and Mr. F. C. Dennis, Circuit Judge, concur. Mr. Justice Cothran did not participate on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. Marshall
318 S.E.2d 133 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Moesley v. Moesley
207 S.E.2d 403 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1974)
Grossman v. Grossman
130 S.E.2d 850 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1963)
Boyer v. Andrews
196 So. 825 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Junghans v. Junghans
112 F.2d 212 (D.C. Circuit, 1940)
Johnson v. Johnson
8 S.E.2d 351 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1940)
Keck v. Keck
26 P.2d 300 (California Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E. 437, 164 S.C. 466, 82 A.L.R. 719, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-alexander-sc-1932.