Alexander v. Alexander
This text of 36 N.E. 293 (Alexander v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The transcript in this cause was filed in this court July 18, 1893. It was submitted August 19. On December 28, 1893, it was dismissed by the clerk, under rule 19, for the want of a brief by appellant, [49]*49who now asks to have the cause reinstated. No good excuse is shown for the delay, and we must, therefore, decline to set aside the rule.
The year has not expired, and the transcript may be refiled without serious prejudice to appellant.
It is desirable that causes should be prepared and briefed within the time fixed by the rules, so far as this may be practicable.
The motion to reinstate is overruled, with leave to withdraw the transcript and brief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 N.E. 293, 9 Ind. App. 48, 1894 Ind. App. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-alexander-indctapp-1894.