Alexander Strull Advertising, Inc. v. Acrolite Products, Inc.

27 A.D.2d 847, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4665

This text of 27 A.D.2d 847 (Alexander Strull Advertising, Inc. v. Acrolite Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander Strull Advertising, Inc. v. Acrolite Products, Inc., 27 A.D.2d 847, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Motion by respondent for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the decision and order of this court, both dated December 27, 1966 [27 A- D 2d 574], are amended by providing that costs and disbursements shall abide the event, instead of awarding $10 costs and disbursements to appellant; determination in said decision and order otherwise adhered to. Beldock, P. J., ITghetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.2d 847, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-strull-advertising-inc-v-acrolite-products-inc-nyappdiv-1967.