Alexander Robert Spitzer v. Jay Abramson
This text of Alexander Robert Spitzer v. Jay Abramson (Alexander Robert Spitzer v. Jay Abramson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
December 4, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
156858 & (46) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder ALEXANDER ROBERT SPITZER, Elizabeth T. Clement, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 156858 COA: 333158 Oakland CC: 2015-145126-NM JAY ABRAMSON, ABRAMSON LAW OFFICES, PLLC, MICHAEL BRYCE WINNICK d/b/a LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL BRYCE WINNICK, Defendants-Appellees.
______________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to strike is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 4, 2018 a1126 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alexander Robert Spitzer v. Jay Abramson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-robert-spitzer-v-jay-abramson-mich-2018.