Alexander Rideaux v. State
This text of Alexander Rideaux v. State (Alexander Rideaux v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________
NO. 09-16-00269-CR NO. 09-16-00270-CR ________________
ALEXANDER RIDEAUX, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 08-5098, 09-5684 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Alexander Rideaux attempts to appeal the trial court’s failure to
grant his motion, in which he asked the trial court to rescind its order that required
payment of court costs, fees, and fines from Rideaux’s inmate trust fund account.
On August 17, 2016, we informed Rideaux that he had not established that the trial
court entered an appealable order, and we notified Rideaux that we would dismiss
the appeals unless we received a response that establishes that an appealable order
1 was entered. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Rideaux filed a response, but he failed to
establish that an appealable order was entered. Accordingly, we dismiss these
appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
APPEALS DISMISSED.
______________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice
Submitted on September 20, 2016 Opinion Delivered September 21, 2016 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alexander Rideaux v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-rideaux-v-state-texapp-2016.