Alexander R. Spitzer v. Attorney Grievance Commissi
This text of Alexander R. Spitzer v. Attorney Grievance Commissi (Alexander R. Spitzer v. Attorney Grievance Commissi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 14, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Robert P. Young, Jr. Brian K. Zahra 155568(4) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein ALEXANDER R. SPITZER, Joan L. Larsen, Plaintiff, Justices SC: 155568 v AGC: 2096-14 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant. _________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant to extend the time for filing its answer to the complaint for superintending control is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before May 9, 2017.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 14, 2017 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alexander R. Spitzer v. Attorney Grievance Commissi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-r-spitzer-v-attorney-grievance-commissi-mich-2017.