Alexander Palomares v. the State of Texas
This text of Alexander Palomares v. the State of Texas (Alexander Palomares v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00249-CR
ALEXANDER GONZALEZ PALOMARES, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 46th District Court Wilbarger County, Texas Trial Court No. 12,889, Counts I, II, & III; Honorable Cornell Curtis, Presiding
December 11, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Alexander Gonzales Palomares, appeals his convictions for aggravated
assault1 and assault family violence.2 The trial court sentenced Appellant to eighty years
of confinement for aggravated assault and to seventy-five years and twenty years of
confinement for two counts of assault family violence. Appellant’s brief was originally due
October 16, 2024, but we granted Appellant’s appointed counsel an extension to
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a)(2)
2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b). November 15 to file a brief due to his caseload. No brief was filed by this deadline. By
letter of November 22, 2024, we admonished counsel that failure to file a brief by
December 2 would result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial
court for further proceedings without further notice. To date, Appellant’s counsel has
neither filed a brief nor had any further communication with this Court.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
(1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
(2) whether Appellant is indigent;
(3) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on Appellant’s behalf;
(4) whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
(5) whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
(6) whether new counsel should be appointed; and
(7) if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by January 10, 2025.
If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint him new
counsel; the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of
any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings. 2 Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before December 27, 2024, he is
directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial
court shall not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alexander Palomares v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-palomares-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.