Alexander House Apartments v. Muhammad

357 F. App'x 514
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2009·No. No. 08-2334·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raheem Muhammad seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding this case back to state court. Because the remand order was based on a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, we conclude we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-28, 116 S.Ct. 494, 133 L.Ed.2d 461 (1995); Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., 519 F.3d 192, 196 (4th Cir.2008); Borneman v. United States, 213 F.3d 819, 824-25 (4th Cir.2000).

Accordingly, we grant Appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal, deny Muhammad’s motion for stay pending appeal and motion to strike, and we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander House Apartments v. Muhammad, 357 F. App'x 514 (4th Cir. 2009).

357 F. App'x 514 (Alexander House Apartments v. Muhammad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related