Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Sachse

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Sachse

3 La. App. 478

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 1, 1926

DocketNo. 8033

StatusPublished

This text of 3 La. App. 478 (Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Sachse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Sachse, 3 La. App. 478 (La. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

ELLIOTT, J.

This suit is based on a contract with the plaintiff, a correspondence school, in which the defendant agreed to pay tuition. The plaintiff alleges that the sum claimed, $102.00 is due, and the defendant resists payment; contending that the plaintiff failed to comply with its part of the contract.

The district judge, after trial, rejected plaintiff’s demand and the plaintiff appealed.

The defendant and appellee moves in the court to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the record was filed in this court after the return day had expired, and the right had been lost.

The appeal was taken June 22, 1925, and was made returnable to this court on July 20, 1925.

The record was not filed in this court until August 3, 1925.

[479]*479We think that the appeal has been lost and that the motion to dismiss must prevail.

It is therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal herein taken be dismissed, at the cost of plaintiff and appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI