Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Huston

254 A.D. 729, 4 N.Y.S.2d 776

This text of 254 A.D. 729 (Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Huston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Huston, 254 A.D. 729, 4 N.Y.S.2d 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s correspondence establishes beyond possibilitjof contradiction the defendant’s liability to the plaintiff. It is so repugnant to the defense of fraud which is asserted in the answer, as to require the conclusion that that defense is a mere afterthought and sham.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements and the motion granted.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 729, 4 N.Y.S.2d 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-hamilton-institute-v-huston-nyappdiv-1938.