Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Folgner
168 Misc. 358, 6 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1793
Opinion
The defense attempts to show by parol that the written contract sued upon was to be ineffectual, if the defendant decided to discontinue the course of studies. This proof would be inadmissible (Jamestown Business College Assn. v. Allen, 172 N. Y. 291), and hence no triable issue remained.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Frankenthaler and Noonan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Folgner, 168 Misc. 358, 6 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
168 Misc. 358 (Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Folgner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jamestown Business College Assn. v. . Allen
64 N.E. 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)