Alexander H. Mall & Co. v. Ullrich

37 F. 653
District Court, N.D. Ohio·Decided December 15, 1888·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Welker, J.

¡Section 5120 of the Revised Statutes (bankrupt law) provided an absolute bar, where the jiefition ivas not filed within two years from the date of the discharge. The limitation is not in any way controlled by the discovery of the fraud; and the limitation provided by law' in actions by or against assignees in bankruptcy founded upon frauds, and providing that the limitation begins to run from the discovering of the fraud does not apply in this class of proceedings. The demurrer is therefore sustained, and petition dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander H. Mall & Co. v. Ullrich, 37 F. 653 (N.D. Ohio 1888).

37 F. 653 (Alexander H. Mall & Co. v. Ullrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Exploration Co.
203 F. 387 (Eighth Circuit, 1913)
In re Wright
177 F. 578 (W.D. New York, 1910)
In re Shaffer
104 F. 982 (E.D. North Carolina, 1900)