Alexander & Co. v. Newton
This text of 2 Va. 266 (Alexander & Co. v. Newton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The Court is of opinion, that it is clearly proved that it was agreed between the appellants Alexander Co. and the appellee Robert Steele, the grantor in the deed of trust to John Newton, of the 3d of July 1837, that the said deed should be so drawn as to secure to the appellants the payment of the debt due to them by the said Steele before and in preference to all other debts in[273]*273tended to be secured by the said deed—that it was the intention of the said Steele that the said deed should be so drawn as to secure that preference, and that the ornission so to draw it, proceeded from the mere mistake of the draftsman thereof. The Court is therefore of opinion, that the decree is erroneous in not directing the payment of the said debt to the appellants, before and in preference to all others. So much of the said decree as is thus declared to be erroneous is reversed with costs, to be paid out of the trust fund, and the residue thereof is affirmed; and the cause is remanded to be proceeded in to a final decree according to the principles of this opinion and decree.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Va. 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-co-v-newton-va-1845.