Alexander, Charles J. v. Peter Okoroha, Individually and as Parent of Ikenna Okoroha, Stephanie Okoroha and Chase Okoroha

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 27, 2002
Docket14-02-01124-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Alexander, Charles J. v. Peter Okoroha, Individually and as Parent of Ikenna Okoroha, Stephanie Okoroha and Chase Okoroha (Alexander, Charles J. v. Peter Okoroha, Individually and as Parent of Ikenna Okoroha, Stephanie Okoroha and Chase Okoroha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander, Charles J. v. Peter Okoroha, Individually and as Parent of Ikenna Okoroha, Stephanie Okoroha and Chase Okoroha, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion filed November 27, 2002

Dismissed and Opinion filed November 27, 2002.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-02-01124-CV

CHARLES J. ALEXANDER, Appellant

V.

PETER OKOROHA, Individually and as Parent of IKENNA OKOROHA, STEPHANIE OKOROHA, and CHASE OKOROHA, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 760,145

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from an order, signed September 4, 2002, granting defendant=s motion for new trial and awarding defendant $1,200 in attorney=s fees. 

A trial court has plenary power over its judgment until it becomes final.  Fruehauf Corp. v. Carrillo, 848 S.W.2d 83, 84 (Tex. 1993).  The trial court also retains continuing control over interlocutory orders and has the power to set those orders aside any time before a final judgment is entered.  Id.  An order granting a new trial is an unappealable, interlocutory order.  Id.


On November 6, 2002, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court=s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  Appellant=s response fails to demonstrate that this Court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed November 27, 2002.

Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fruehauf Corp. v. Carrillo
848 S.W.2d 83 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alexander, Charles J. v. Peter Okoroha, Individually and as Parent of Ikenna Okoroha, Stephanie Okoroha and Chase Okoroha, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-charles-j-v-peter-okoroha-individually-a-texapp-2002.