Alexander Candelario, Individually and on Behalf of Practice Interactive, Inc. v. Bridget Mueller and Felipe Pereira Ribeiro

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: November 25, 2025
• Docket: 03-25-00839-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-25-00839-CV

Alexander Candelario, Individually and on behalf of Practice Interactive, Inc., Appellant

v.

Bridget Mueller and Felipe Pereira Ribeiro, Appellees

FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-23-007678, THE HONORABLE MARIA CANTÚ HEXSEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant filed a “Notice of Mandamus Appeal” prompting the clerk’s office to

file it as a notice of appeal. Because the order denying a motion for summary judgment appealed

from is not a final or appealable judgment or order, this Court’s clerk asked the parties by letter

whether this Court has jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal. Appellant replied that he

intended only to file a petition for writ of mandamus, which he has in In re Candelario,

No. 03-25-00863-CV. Appellant agrees that this Court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal in

this cause.

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); see

generally Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014 (listing appealable interlocutory orders).

__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: November 25, 2025