Alex Villalobos v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 2, 2017
Docket14-16-00593-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Alex Villalobos v. State (Alex Villalobos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alex Villalobos v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed March 2, 2017

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-16-00593-CR ____________

ALEX VILLALOBOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 6 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018160

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant’s brief was filed October 31, 2016. The brief raised issues concerning the voluntariness of his statement.

On November 3, 2016, we abated this appeal and directed the trial court to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 38.22 § 6 (West 2005); Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). On January 13, 2017, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed that contains two sets of proposed findings and conclusions, one by appellant and the other by the State. However, the supplemental clerk’s record does not contain findings of fact and conclusions of law signed by the trial court.

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this court on or before March 31, 2017. If the trial court’s findings were dictated into the record, the trial court is directed to include those findings in a supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before March 31, 2017.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

After the appeal is reinstated, appellant may file an amended brief to address the trial court’s findings and conclusions. Any such brief is due 30 days after the case is reinstated.

The State’s motion for extension to file its brief, filed February 16, 2017, is GRANTED. The State’s brief is due 60 days after the case is reinstated or 30 days after appellant’s amended brief is filed, whichever is later.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Urias v. State
155 S.W.3d 141 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alex Villalobos v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alex-villalobos-v-state-texapp-2017.