Alex v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Alex v. State

507 P.2d 718, 89 Nev. 111, 1973 Nev. LEXIS 436

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 22, 1973·No. No. 6914·Published

Opinion

[112]*112OPINION

Per Curiam:

Walter Alex, through a post-conviction proceeding, seeks release from prison on the ground that another person, one Alfred “Cat” Adams, committed the crime. Adams so testified. The district court did not believe his testimony since he had come forward in like fashion for other convicted persons, and since the record of the trial otherwise supports the conviction of Alex. The court acted within its discretion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[112]*112OPINION

Per Curiam:

Walter Alex, through a post-conviction proceeding, seeks release from prison on the ground that another person, one Alfred “Cat” Adams, committed the crime. Adams so testified. The district court did not believe his testimony since he had come forward in like fashion for other convicted persons, and since the record of the trial otherwise supports the conviction of Alex. The court acted within its discretion.

Affirmed.

Alex v. State, 507 P.2d 718, 89 Nev. 111, 1973 Nev. LEXIS 436 (Neb. 1973).

Pincite

507 P.2d 718 (Alex v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.