Alex v. Mabus

Fourth Circuit

Alex v. Mabus

506 F. App'x 240

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 24, 2013

DocketNo. 12-1968

StatusPublished

This text of 506 F. App'x 240 (Alex v. Mabus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alex v. Mabus, 506 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher D. Alex appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action in which he asserted a violation of his First Amendment rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible [241]*241error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alex v. Mabus, No. 1:11-cv-01207-LMB-IDD, 2012 WL 2366151 (E.D.Va. June 20, 2012). We deny Alex’s motion for appointment of counsel and for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher D. Alex appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action in which he asserted a violation of his First Amendment rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible [241]*241error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alex v. Mabus, No. 1:11-cv-01207-LMB-IDD, 2012 WL 2366151 (E.D.Va. June 20, 2012). We deny Alex’s motion for appointment of counsel and for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 F. App'x 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alex-v-mabus-ca4-2013.