Alex Ray Fox v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-12-00008-CR THROUGH 07-12-00017-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
APRIL 5, 2012
ALEX RAY FOX, APPELLANT
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
FROM THE 223RD DISTRICT COURT OF GRAY COUNTY;
NO. 8646 THROUGH 8655; HONORABLE PHIL N. VANDERPOOL, JUDGE
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
Appellant Alex Ray Fox appeals his convictions for possession with intent to
promote child pornography1 and the resulting concurrent sentences of ten years of
imprisonment. The reporter’s record was filed on February 2, 2012. The clerk’s record
was filed on April 3, 2012. Included in the clerk’s record is the trial court’s certification of
defendant’s right of appeal. However, this certification is not signed by appellant or his
attorney. As such, this certification does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate
1 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.26 (West 2011). Procedure 25.2(d), which requires that the certification be signed by appellant and that
a copy be provided him.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court to
amend its certification of defendant’s right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(f). On
remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means it finds necessary to obtain
appellant's signature on an amended trial court's certification and to provide him a copy
of the certification. The court further is directed to cause the amended certification and
any orders signed by the court on remand to be collected into a supplemental clerk’s
record, which shall be filed with the clerk of this Court by April 27, 2012.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alex Ray Fox v. State (Alex Ray Fox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.