Alex. Murphy & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Alex. Murphy & Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 525

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 25, 1957

DocketV. D. 45; Entry No. 11968

StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 525 (Alex. Murphy & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alex. Murphy & Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 525 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This is a valuation proceeding which arose by reason of a judgment rendered by the first division of this court in the case of Alex. Murphy & Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 308, Abstract 58836. By that judgment, under the terms of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)), the matter was remanded to a single judge to “determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise.” The proceeding before me has been abandoned by counsel for the importer. It is, therefore, dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This is a valuation proceeding which arose by reason of a judgment rendered by the first division of this court in the case of Alex. Murphy & Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 308, Abstract 58836. By that judgment, under the terms of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)), the matter was remanded to a single judge to “determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise.” The proceeding before me has been abandoned by counsel for the importer. It is, therefore, dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Cust. Ct. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alex-murphy-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack