Alex Meruelo v. Cir

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 14, 2012·No. 11-70015·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEX MERUELO ; LISET MERUELO , No. 11-70015 Petitioners-Appellants, Tax Ct. No. v. 624-04

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , ORDER Respondent-Appellee.

Filed November 14, 2012

Before: M. Margaret McKeown and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Roger T. Benitez, District Judge.*

ORDER

The Opinion filed on August 16, 2012, slip op. 9401, and appearing at 691 F.3d 1108, is amended as follows:

At slip op. 9419, line 8, please replace the sentence that currently states,

* The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern California, sitting by designation. 2 MERUELO V . CIR

still fails,> with the following sentence:

With this amendment the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge McKeown and Judge N.R. Smith have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Benitez has so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed in response to the amended opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alex Meruelo v. Cir, (9th Cir. 2012).

Alex Meruelo v. Cir (Alex Meruelo v. Cir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meruelo v. Commissioner
691 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)