Alex Mandujano v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 4, 2010
Docket04-10-00399-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Alex Mandujano v. State (Alex Mandujano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alex Mandujano v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00399-CR

Alex MANDUJANO, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CR-5646 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 4, 2010

DISMISSED

Alex Mandujano was indicted for murder. He later pleaded guilty to manslaughter pursuant

to a plea bargain with the State. As part of his plea-bargain, Mandujano signed a separate “Waiver

of Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Mandujano

timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the plea bargain agreement and 04-10-00399-CR

the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). This court

must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not

been made part of the record.” Id.

The court gave Mandujano notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial

court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within

thirty days. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.–San

Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet.

ref’d) (not designated for publication). Mandujano’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written

response, stating she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the

record and counsel’s notice, we agree that Mandujano does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v.

State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s

record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal.

TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).

Do not publish

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alex Mandujano v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alex-mandujano-v-state-texapp-2010.