Alex Mandujano v. State
This text of Alex Mandujano v. State (Alex Mandujano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00399-CR
Alex MANDUJANO, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CR-5646 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 4, 2010
DISMISSED
Alex Mandujano was indicted for murder. He later pleaded guilty to manslaughter pursuant
to a plea bargain with the State. As part of his plea-bargain, Mandujano signed a separate “Waiver
of Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-
bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Mandujano
timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the plea bargain agreement and 04-10-00399-CR
the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). This court
must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not
been made part of the record.” Id.
The court gave Mandujano notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial
court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within
thirty days. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.–San
Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet.
ref’d) (not designated for publication). Mandujano’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written
response, stating she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the
record and counsel’s notice, we agree that Mandujano does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v.
State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s
record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal.
TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).
Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alex Mandujano v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alex-mandujano-v-state-texapp-2010.