Alex M. Ex Rel. Gennaro M. v. City of New York

2017 NY Slip Op 1982, 148 A.D.3d 533, 48 N.Y.S.3d 598
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 16, 2017
Docket350638/09 3438N 3437
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 1982 (Alex M. Ex Rel. Gennaro M. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alex M. Ex Rel. Gennaro M. v. City of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 1982, 148 A.D.3d 533, 48 N.Y.S.3d 598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered on or about December 2, 2015, which granted nonparty respondent’s (Irom) motion to confirm a referee’s report, dated September 14, 2015, recommending an apportionment of fees between outgoing and incoming counsel, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, dated March 19, 2015, but apparently never entered, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

The referee’s findings are supported by the record (see Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454, 458 [1989]; Board of Mgrs. of Boro Park Vil.-Phase I Condominium v Boro Park Townhouse Assoc., 284 AD2d 237, 238 [1st Dept 2001]). He considered the relevant factors (Lai Ling Cheng, 73 NY2d at 458; Board of Mgrs., 284 AD2d at 237). As the trier of fact, he was in the best position to determine the issues referred to him (Namer v 152-54-56 W. 15th St. Realty Corp., 108 AD2d 705 [1st Dept 1985]).

The appeal from the March order should be dismissed, because the order was never entered (see Jemzura v Jemzura, 24 AD2d 809 [3d Dept 1965]). Furthermore, nonparty appellant does not object to the reference directed by the order, but rather to the fact that, in a transcript that was not entered, the court ruled that Irom was not discharged for cause. That ruling is not appealable (Matter of Juan Alejandro R., 221 *534 AD2d 183 [1st Dept 1995]; see also Clemons v Schindler El. Corp., 87 AD3d 452 [1st Dept 2011]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co.
539 N.E.2d 570 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
Jemzura v. Jemzura
24 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Clemons v. Schindler Elevator Corp.
87 A.D.3d 452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Namer v. 152-54-56 West 15th Street Realty Corp.
108 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Board of Managers of the Boro Park Village-Phase I Condominium v. Boro Park Townhouse Associates
284 A.D.2d 237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 1982, 148 A.D.3d 533, 48 N.Y.S.3d 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alex-m-ex-rel-gennaro-m-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2017.