Alex Hofrichter, P.A. v. Donald S. Zuckerman, P.A.

623 So. 2d 829, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9093, 1993 WL 337149
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 7, 1993·No. No. 92-2075·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the post-judgment order denying discovery in aid of execution based on the appellee Donald S. Zuckerman’s invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination, without prejudice to the appellants [Alex Hofrichter, P.A. and Aex Hofri-chter, individually] to raise in the trial court on remand an issue which was expressly reserved by the trial court for future determination, namely, whether the appellee Donald S. Zuckerman has, by his conduct, waived his right to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in this proceeding. See, e.g., United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F.2d 1349, 1356 (11th Cir.1991); Rainerman v. Eagle Nat'l Bank of Miami, 541 So.2d 740 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alex Hofrichter, P.A. v. Donald S. Zuckerman, P.A., 623 So. 2d 829, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9093, 1993 WL 337149 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

623 So. 2d 829 (Alex Hofrichter, P.A. v. Donald S. Zuckerman, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hofrichter v. Zuckerman & Venditti
710 So. 2d 127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)