Alex Hernandez Orona v. the State of Texas
This text of Alex Hernandez Orona v. the State of Texas (Alex Hernandez Orona v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00092-CR
ALEX HERNANDEZ ORONA, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 100th District Court Carson County, Texas Trial Court No. 7246, Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding
October 12, 2023 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Alex Hernandez Orona, appeals his convictions for evading arrest in a
motor vehicle1 and aggravated assault on a public servant2 and concurrent sentences to
twenty-five years’ and sixty years’ confinement. The appellate record was originally due
July 7, 2023. The clerk’s record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter’s record was
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04.
2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02. not. We subsequently granted the reporter three extensions to file the reporter’s record
due to her caseload and medical issues. By letter of September 7, 2023, we admonished
the reporter that failure to file the reporter’s record by September 19 could result in the
appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings
without further notice. The reporter has since requested a fourth extension to file the
reporter’s record due to her continuing medical issues.
We deny the request for extension, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the
trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate
courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”);
37.3(a)(2) (requiring appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid
further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely
filed). On remand, the trial court shall determine the following:
(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;
(2) why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;
(3) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those
tasks; and
(4) whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court
finds reasonable.
Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days
to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter
to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
2 supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by November
13, 2023.
Should the reporter file the record on or before October 26, 2023, she is directed
to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall
not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alex Hernandez Orona v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alex-hernandez-orona-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.