Alex Clarco, A.K.A. Al Calarco v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Al Clarco, James Zimmerman v. United States
This text of 207 F.2d 958 (Alex Clarco, A.K.A. Al Calarco v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Al Clarco, James Zimmerman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These appeals, which involve three separate trials in the district court, were consolidated for hearing on this appeal, inasmuch as the same attorney represented all the convicted appellants in the three cases and the same assistant United States Attorney represented the ap-pellee in all the cases, and for the further reason that the cases involve the same main issue: namely, whether the defendants were unlawfully entrapped;
And the court, having examined the evidence in the cases and having consid *959 ered the full record, the oral arguments and the briefs of attorneys for the parties, and it appearing that the actions of the informer — while not commendable— did not go beyond permissible limits established by law in the procuring of evidence against the defendants;
And inasmuch as no prejudicial error is inherent in the charge of the court, or in any ruling on evidence or on any procedural matter;
The judgments of conviction and sentence imposed by the district court are all, accordingly, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 F.2d 958, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alex-clarco-aka-al-calarco-v-united-states-of-america-two-cases-al-ca6-1953.