Aleta May Stuart v. Russell C. Pearce and John M. Rehse

Sixth Circuit

Aleta May Stuart v. Russell C. Pearce and John M. Rehse

275 F.2d 283, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5471

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 2, 1960·No. 14138·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the Court that the record on appeal in this case was tendered for filing and docketing on August 7, 1959; that the appellant has failed to deposit the filing fee as required by Rule 14(3) of this Court, 28 U.S.C.A. and has taken no steps to prosecute the appeal;

It is now ordered that the appeal be and it is docketed and dismissed for want of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the Court that the record on appeal in this case was tendered for filing and docketing on August 7, 1959; that the appellant has failed to deposit the filing fee as required by Rule 14(3) of this Court, 28 U.S.C.A. and has taken no steps to prosecute the appeal;

It is now ordered that the appeal be and it is docketed and dismissed for want of prosecution.

Aleta May Stuart v. Russell C. Pearce and John M. Rehse, 275 F.2d 283, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5471 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

275 F.2d 283 (Aleta May Stuart v. Russell C. Pearce and John M. Rehse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.