Alessi v. Mange

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alessi v. Mange

7 A.D.2d 880, 182 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10392

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 880 (Alessi v. Mange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alessi v. Mange, 7 A.D.2d 880, 182 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by striking from the first ordering paragraph thereof the words “ unless the plaintiff and defendants will consent and stipulate to increase the verdict to the sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00), and it is further ” and by inserting in place thereof, following the word “ costs ”, the words “ on the ground of inadequacy ”, and order further modified by striking therefrom the second ordering paragraph and as modified affirmed, with costs to respondent to abide the event. (See Burdick v. Murray, 6 A D 2d 855.) All concur. (Appeal from an order of Monroe Trial Term, setting aside the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff and granting a new trial unless defendant stipulates te increase the verdict, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by striking from the first ordering paragraph thereof the words “ unless the plaintiff and defendants will consent and stipulate to increase the verdict to the sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00), and it is further ” and by inserting in place thereof, following the word “ costs ”, the words “ on the ground of inadequacy ”, and order further modified by striking therefrom the second ordering paragraph and as modified affirmed, with costs to respondent to abide the event. (See Burdick v. Murray, 6 A D 2d 855.) All concur. (Appeal from an order of Monroe Trial Term, setting aside the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff and granting a new trial unless defendant stipulates te increase the verdict, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 880, 182 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alessi-v-mange-nyappdiv-1959.