Alessi Equipment, Inc. v. American Piledriving Equipment, Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------X ALESSI EQUIPMENT, INC.,
Plaintiff,
-against-
AMERICAN PILEDRIVING EQUIPMENT, INC., ORDER Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------------X 18 Civ. 3976 (JCM) AMERICAN PILEDRIVING EQUIPMENT, INC.,
Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
-against-
ALESSI EQUIPMENT, INC.,
Counterclaim-Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------X
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ submissions regarding prejudgment interest and Defendant American Piledriving Equipment, Inc.’s (“APE”) intention to move for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 59(a). (Docket Nos. 176; 177). If the parties cannot agree on the appropriate triggering date for prejudgment interest, Plaintiff Alessi Equipment, Inc. (“Alessi”) must move pursuant to Rule 59(e) to amend the judgment to add prejudgment interest starting from Alessi’s preferred triggering date. See generally Foresco Co. v. Oh, 337 F. Supp. 3d 304, 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2018); see also Stanford Square, L.L.C. v. Nomura Asset Cap. Corp., 232 F. Supp. 2d 289, 291 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). If APE moves for a new trial, the Court will address that request along with Alessi’s motion. Dated: June 23, 2022 White Plains, New York
SO ORDERED:
_______________________________ JUDITH C. McCARTHY United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alessi Equipment, Inc. v. American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. (Alessi Equipment, Inc. v. American Piledriving Equipment, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.