ALERDING CASTOR HEWITT LLP v. FLETCHER

District Court, S.D. Indiana·Decided September 16, 2021·No. 1:16-cv-02453·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

ALERDING CASTOR HEWITT LLP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:16-cv-02453-JPH-MJD ) PAUL FLETCHER, ) CAROLE WOCKNER, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER ON PREJUDGMENT INTEREST

"Prejudgment interest is intended to compensate a plaintiff for delay in receiving money it should have received much earlier or should not have been required to spend in the first place." BRC Rubber & Plastics, Inc., Continental Carbon Co., 981 F.3d 618, 635 (7th Cir. 2020). In diversity-jurisdiction cases like this one, state law governs "the propriety of awarding prejudgment interest." Id. "Under Indiana law, interest may be awarded where the value of the damage is not in dispute and the damages are ascertainable in accordance with fixed rules of evidence and accepted standards of valuation at the time the damages accrued." Id. "This standard leaves considerable play in the joints," so prejudgment interest calculations are committed to the Court's discretion. Id. Here, the jury returned a verdict for Plaintiff on its breach of contract claim and awarded actual damages of $67,423.24. That verdict entitles Plaintiff to an award of prejudgment interest because "a party needs to show only that the obligor breached the contract by failing to pay the appropriate amount by a particular time." Care Group Heart Hospital, LLC v. Sawyer, 93 N.E.3d 745, 757 (Ind. 2018). "Prejudgment interest is computed from the time the principal amount

was demanded or due." BRC Rubber, 981 F.3d at 636; see Indiana Code § 24- 4.6-1-103. Here, Plaintiff's first invoice demanding payment of the entire amount sought in this case is dated July 21, 2016, with payment due fifteen days later. Plaintiff's trial exhibit 45.1 Prejudgment interest is therefore computed from August 5, 2016. The parties' agreement did not set an interest rate for unpaid balances, see dkt. 1-2 at 7–8; Plaintiff's trial exhibit 12, so the statutory rate of 8% applies, Indiana Code § 24-4.6-1-103; BRC Rubber, 981 F.3d at 636 ("Where

the parties have not agreed to a specified interest rate, Indiana law directs courts to use the rate of 8% per year."). At an 8% rate, the actual damages of $67,423.24 accrued prejudgment interest of $14.78 per day (.08/365*67,423.24). See id. (affirming prejudgment interest similarly calculated "per diem through the date of judgment"). August 5, 2016 through September 16, 2021—the date of judgment—is 1,869 days. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to $27,623.82 in prejudgment interest.

1 While some of the awarded damages may have been billed on previous invoices, that breakdown is unascertainable and therefore cannot support prejudgment interest from an earlier date. See BRC Rubber. 981 F.3d at 636; Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. BACT Holdings, Inc., 723 N.E.2d 436, 441 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000) ("Prejudgment interest is awarded where the damages are ascertainable in accordance with fixed rules of evidence and accepted standards of valuation at the time the damages accrued. . . . Yet, it has been allowed even where some degree of judgment must be used to measure damages."). Final judgment in accordance with the jury's verdict and this order shall issue by separate entry. SO ORDERED. Date: 9/16/2021

Sjamnu Patnaik Hanbore James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana Distribution: PAUL FLETCHER 1203 E. Cota Street Santa Barbara, CA 93103 CAROLE WOCKNER 1203 E. Cota Street Santa Barbara, CA 93103 Michael J. Alerding ALERDING CASTOR LLP malerding@alerdingcastor.com Michael E. Brown KIGHTLINGER & GRAY, LLP (Indianapolis) mbrown@k-glaw.com Abraham Murphy murphy@abrahammurphy.com

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALERDING CASTOR HEWITT LLP v. FLETCHER, (S.D. Ind. 2021).

ALERDING CASTOR HEWITT LLP v. FLETCHER (ALERDING CASTOR HEWITT LLP v. FLETCHER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. BACT Holdings, Inc.
723 N.E.2d 436 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
The Care Group Heart Hospital, LLC v. Roderick J. Sawyer, M.D.
93 N.E.3d 745 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2018)