Alendorf v. Stickle

New York Supreme Court

Alendorf v. Stickle

2 Cow. 412

New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1823·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The plaintiff must take costs according to his judgment, which is for the penalty. Godfrey v. Vancott, 13 John. 345.) It is peculiarly proper, in this case, that it [413]*413should be so, for the bond is conditioned, among other things, to perform covenants; and the judgment ought to stand as security for further breaches. It would have been otherwise, had it been merely for the payment of money. (Van Antwerp v. Ingersoll, 2 Caines’ Rep. 107. 1 R. L. 515, 516.)

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia.

The plaintiff must take costs according to his judgment, which is for the penalty. Godfrey v. Vancott, 13 John. 345.) It is peculiarly proper, in this case, that it [413]*413should be so, for the bond is conditioned, among other things, to perform covenants; and the judgment ought to stand as security for further breaches. It would have been otherwise, had it been merely for the payment of money. (Van Antwerp v. Ingersoll, 2 Caines’ Rep. 107. 1 R. L. 515, 516.)

Motion denied.

Alendorf v. Stickle, 2 Cow. 412 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

Pincite

2 Cow. 412 (Alendorf v. Stickle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related