Alemany v. Ortega

California Supreme Court

Alemany v. Ortega

4 P. 13, 2 Cal. Unrep. 323

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMay 29, 1884

DocketNo. 9494

StatusPublished

This text of 4 P. 13 (Alemany v. Ortega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alemany v. Ortega, 4 P. 13, 2 Cal. Unrep. 323 (Cal. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

By the COURT.

This is an action for an alleged forcible entry upon lands alleged to have then been in the actual occupancy of the plaintiff. We think the evidence fails to show that there was any forcible entry on the part of the defendant or that the land in question was in the possession of the plaintiff. But that, on the contrary, it shows that the land was in the possession of Francisco Mora, bishop of Monterey, and lessor of the defendant at the time of the latter’s entry.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

This is an action for an alleged forcible entry upon lands alleged to have then been in the actual occupancy of the plaintiff. We think the evidence fails to show that there was any forcible entry on the part of the defendant or that the land in question was in the possession of the plaintiff. But that, on the contrary, it shows that the land was in the possession of Francisco Mora, bishop of Monterey, and lessor of the defendant at the time of the latter’s entry.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 P. 13, 2 Cal. Unrep. 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alemany-v-ortega-cal-1884.