Aleman-Barriera v. Hooper
889 So. 2d 120, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17934, 2004 WL 2727454
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 24, 2004·No. No. 3D03-3133·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We reverse the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the denial of benefits. Although the conduct cited by the employer supports the claimant’s dismissal, it “does not amount to misconduct necessary to deny unemployment compensation benefits.... ” Baber v. Florida Keyes Children’s Shelter Inc., 701 So.2d 125, 125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); see Reaves v. ANC Rental Corp. 871 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) and eases cited therein.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aleman-Barriera v. Hooper, 889 So. 2d 120, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17934, 2004 WL 2727454 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
889 So. 2d 120 (Aleman-Barriera v. Hooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tobkin v. State
889 So. 2d 120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)