Aleman-Barriera v. Hooper

889 So. 2d 120, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17934, 2004 WL 2727454
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 24, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-3133
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 889 So. 2d 120 (Aleman-Barriera v. Hooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aleman-Barriera v. Hooper, 889 So. 2d 120, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17934, 2004 WL 2727454 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the denial of benefits. Although the conduct cited by the employer supports the claimant’s dismissal, it “does not amount to misconduct necessary to deny unemployment compensation benefits.... ” Baber v. Florida Keyes Children’s Shelter Inc., 701 So.2d 125, 125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); see Reaves v. ANC Rental Corp. 871 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) and eases cited therein.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tobkin v. State
889 So. 2d 120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 So. 2d 120, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17934, 2004 WL 2727454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aleman-barriera-v-hooper-fladistctapp-2004.