Alekseev v. City Council
992 A.2d 858, 605 Pa. 589, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 782
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 16, 2010
DocketAppeal, No. 493 EAL 2009
StatusPublished
This text of 992 A.2d 858 (Alekseev v. City Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alekseev v. City Council, 992 A.2d 858, 605 Pa. 589, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 782 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
[590]*590 ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
a. Is the public participation provision of the Sunshine Act 65 Pa.C.S. § 710.1 satisfied when members of the public are never permitted to address the governing body of a municipality, but are only permitted to address a committee comprised of less than a quorum?
b. Does a meeting of a committee of a municipal governing body, comprised of less than a quorum of the governing body, meet the Sunshine Act’s definition of a “special meeting” and if so does this relieve the governing body of the obligation to receive public comment at its meetings?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 710.1
Pennsylvania § 710.1
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
992 A.2d 858, 605 Pa. 589, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alekseev-v-city-council-pa-2010.